Court Throws Out Rapper Drake's Legal Case Regarding Kendrick Lamar's Diss Track
A court official has thrown out the rapper Drake’s defamation lawsuit against the music corporation concerning Kendrick Lamar's track Not Like Us.
Judge the court’s judge decided that the rapper’s song lyrics, which claimed Drake and his associates of being "certified paedophiles", were "protected opinion" and cannot be considered defamatory.
The Canadian rapper submitted the legal action in early this year, accusing UMG, the music company representing the two rappers, of defamatory conduct by allowing the song to be published and marketed, saying it spread a "untrue and harmful story".
The artist’s spokesperson said he intended to appeal the decision. Universal Music Group said it was pleased with the outcome and was looking forward to continuing its collaboration with the rapper.
Background of the Hip-Hop Feud
The diss song, which was first dropped in May 2024, was widely seen as the final strike in an ongoing battle between the competing artists.
It has emerged as the biggest hit of the rapper’s musical journey, having received multiple Grammy awards and being one of the most-talked about moments of his Super Bowl performance in early 2025.
In a 38-page order, Judge Vargas called the dispute between the rappers "the most notorious hip-hop feud in the genre's history".
"Both rappers’ seven-track rap battle was a 'verbal conflict' that was the subject of extensive press coverage and online discourse," the court wrote.
"While the accusation that Drake is a child predator is certainly a serious one, the broader context of a intense musical rivalry, with provocative remarks and insulting claims hurled by both participants, would not lead the average audience to believe that 'the track' imparts truthful statements about plaintiff."
She additionally observed that, in an earlier song, the artist had "dared his rival to make the paedophilia accusations" that appeared in Not Like Us.
On the song Taylor Made Freestyle, the rapper used the synthetic vocals of Tupac Shakur to suggest strategies on how to win the rap battle.
"Suggest he has a preference for minors, consider that a tip," the song suggested.
"It is in this context in which such lyrics as 'Say, Drake, I hear you like 'em young' must be evaluated," wrote the court.
"The parallel in the phrasing strongly indicates that this line is a clear reference to Drake's lyrics in the earlier release."
'A Slap in the Face to Creatives'
The musician, whose real name is Aubrey Drake Graham, did not sue Lamar in the legal filing.
His lawyers accused UMG of initiating "an effort to generate a viral hit" out of a release that made the "false factual allegation that Drake is a convicted predator, and to imply that the public should resort to vigilante justice in retaliation".
Deciding against Drake, the judge said listeners would not expect "truthful accounts" from a musical attack "replete with profanity, trash-talking, threats of violence, and figurative and hyperbolic language."
She highlighted that the rapper himself had used comparable rhetoric, quoting a line in which the artist "strongly" suggested that "Lamar is a domestic abuser", and a separate instance where he "raps that he 'heard' that one of Lamar's sons may not be biologically his."
Concerning Lamar's song, Judge Vargas said: "Although seemingly factual claims may assume the character of statements of opinion... when made in public debate, heated labour dispute, or other circumstances in which an listener may expect the use of epithets, passionate language or exaggeration."
Reacting to the dismissal, a label representative said: "From the outset, this case was an insult to every creative and their creative expression and never should have seen the light of day."
"We are satisfied with the court's dismissal and are eager to continuing our partnership effectively marketing Drake's music and supporting his artistic path," the representative continued.
A representative for the musician said the rapper intended to appeal the decision, "and we await the Court of Appeals examining it".
Kendrick Lamar has not yet issue a statement on the case.